When the Governor General hurriedly proclaimed King Charles of England was our King too, it did not feel right. I began to look at the governance and documents etc supporting the right of the federal government to make decisions and rule us on our behalf.
After the death of Queen Victoria the British North America as modified by the UK Statute of Revision Act 1993 removed the monarchy from having any control or to do with the affairs of what was called Canada. Did 197 federal Members of Parliament commit treason when they rejected a bill allowing MP’s to opt out of an oath to King Charles? They take an oath of fealty to a foreign monarch -NOT TO THE CITIZENS OF CANADA. This is just one more area that our Federal MP’s in the major 2 parties have obediently done as their deep state puppet masters commanded. In the next federal election it will make little difference who wins it will be the same puppet master in control. In the past I paid little attention the deep state directing our politicians to serve them rather than Canadians, although was aware our politicians were often little more than puppets under the control of an unaccountable puppet master. It has become increasingly obvious the British Crown is associated with the deep state – global and locally.
Among other points I wish to make with this stack is, no one from what we call Canada has legally signed or authorised the control of the World Health (WHO) over us. If we stand up to them we do not have to comply with either the International Health Agreement or the the Pandemic Treaty or what ever they are calling it today.
Since 1901 Canada has been a republic, an oath to a foreign monarch is treason and should be considered High Treason. All laws passed by governments, federal, provincial and junior governments are ultra vires or outside their authority. It could be said we have since the death of Queen Victoria been legally in a state of constant anarchy.
Until recently treason was still a capital offence now merely life imprisonment. Most of us at one time took an oath to the monarch of the country. We did so out of ignorance, misbelieving the monarch of Great Britain was the leader of our country. Fact checking (not paid for by Bill Gates et al) shows otherwise. Immediately on the death of Queen Victoria we were freed from the yoke of the British Crown or maybe would be more accurate if we said the global deep state as represented by the British crown and parliament. Until recently, I believed we were in a harmless way we were tied to fealty to the British Crown as a nod to our colonial past. Yes, we have the? offices of the governor and lieutenant generals which cost us money but, even as a republic we would have some one in those offices and the expens,e. The only time they are an expense is when one of the royals visit – a cost we would have to pay for any any visiting “Internationally Protected Person”. That designation included Trump’s children when they came to Canada to open a building in Vancouver.
What is the legal reason why the British Monarchy is no longer ours as they were in 1867? We need to look at the British North America Act of 1867 (BNA) for that. From what I can determine that despite what we have been taught the act was not the creation of our Fathers of Confederation meeting in Charlottetown but, a creation of the British Deep State through the British Parliament and imposed on Canada, yes it would have appeared to be what we wanted but, was it?
The act as enacted included a section 2 "Application of Provisions referring to the Queen.
The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.
So far that is what we have been taught and believe,
The Statute Revision Act of 1893 repealed this section.
When the act was patriated in 1982 it was patriated without section 2. the endnotes of the constitution specifically notes “Section 2, repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act, 1893, 56-57 Vict., c. 14 (U.K.), read as follows: 2 The Provisions of this Act referring to Her Majesty the Queen extend also to the Heirs and Successors of Her Majesty, Kings and Queens of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. While there are problems with this act and should have been rethought and been rewritten, to be followed a by sea to sea to sea referendum, it was not. It does represent an effort on the part of the then Prime Minister and provincial premiers to address the various issues. The heritage and even general world views have changed significantly since 1867. Does the constitution act reflect the residents of what is called Canada want. Time for a national conversation without political interference from the politicians.
It may be time for a radical shift in the way things are done. Maybe a change is needed. Could the science fiction novel by Wernher von Braun, yes that von Braun the head rocket scientist at NASA With a major difference this time instead of the population fleeing the politicians, we should send the politicians there instead. I understand Musk needs intrepid volunteers to go. The leader in von Braun’s scifi was named Elon.
The BNA/Constitution Act were not written in Canada or by any representatives of what was referred to as Canadians. It is a UK act written by the British deep state, passed and enacted in the UK.
We must have a national (nation is not a direct synonym for Country) conversation and referendum on what are we. Frankly, I am not convinced we are a nation considering the various inter-provincial conflicts.
Some of the foundation material in this stack is based on two Druthers articles, “Canada the Grand Deception” by Timm Stein, June 2023 and February 2024.
Oaths to the Monarch