Justin Trudeau is doing his job well.
Note: I did not say he is doing a good job. Like most political leaders Trudeau’s real job is to provide a diversion so the evil ones can steal control over humanity. Blaming Trudeau for the wrongs the governments of Canada are committing is pointless and criticizing him does no more to change things than a dog barking at a passing car. His real job as defined and imposed on him by the evil ones is to create a diversion and focus for protest and division among the people. Keep the people divided and not united is a key tactic of weak leaders. The current rhetoric from the self defined right wing against the assumed left wing ideas, (what economic theory and mask mandates have to do with each other escapes me) is counterproductive to the campaign we should unite on. That of reclaiming our freedom, our country, our right to be human.
In the same sense I felt from the beginning Trump was put into office to divert and entertain the masses. He reminded me of a rodeo clown, sent into the ring when a crisis happens and it is necessary to divert public attention, complete with frizzy red hair, an outlandish appearance and say silly things bordering on stupid The US was fortunate they had a clown to divert the people, Canada got Trudeau.
The biggest critisim of Trudeau is he has no back bone and will do as his masters at the WEF order him to but then, is he different than many political leaders in the last 20 years?. Don’t expect a change in which party in the House of Commons has a majority and a new face as leader, they are all lackeys of the WEF and will do their bidding over what is best for their constituents. This lack of real difference in the parties and what they do once sitting in the “big seat” was brought home to me after the 2013 provincial election in BC. By any rational logic Adrian Dix should have defeated Christy Clark. The polls made this very clear. Even days before the election. What happened?
During the election Dix and the NDP used Hill and Knowlton part of the Britain based WPP plc group as their PR advisors. Why a political party needs a PR firm to promote their platform with the electors escapes me. Can one think of the election as anything but rigged when the BC Liberals used the same PR firm for the election. This realisation prompted me to rethink political parties and view them as just one party with different franchises – recognised by the colour of the bunting they use to wrap themselves on the big chair.
In BC we have 4 franchises of the party identified by their colours. Currently only the red and the orange are allowed the big seat with the blue and green scheming how next election they can acquire more points to have a chance at the lucrative franchise of BC. Makes little difference what the colour of the franchise holder bunting is, they all answer to the corporate head office.
Seems you can ask a similar question across Canada. In the case of BC when Horgan ousted Clark apart from a bit of window dressing changes, did you see or experience anything different when Horgan was the top figure head to bark at. No matter what one’s political (economic ) allegiances are, every person I have asked says they did not notice a change. After leaving politics both Horgan and Clark have been awarded directorships with large corporations. The thought crossed my mind it appears crime does pay.
A fundamental truth re political leaders of any party is by the time one gets to a position in the party where they will be allowed to be a leader, they are so deep in the party machine they are no longer their own person and have to bow to the deep state behind the parties.
The evil ones have shifted gears a bit with Poilievre whom they market as not a WEFer now that being a Schwab “bitch”has gone out of fashion and and may mean their person may require significant vote rigging or similar to be electable.
Is there something we can do to wrest our country back from the evil ones? I feel one thing would be to ban political parties and return our political system to as envisioned years ago and elect the local rep that one feels will best represent your views and concerns. They then go to parliament and align with others with similar views and choose an individual they will confidence in to lead them and they follow – the meaning behind “lost confidence of the house”
Have you looked at virtually every political party’s web site?
Before one can get to what is the party about etc the first thing one sees is SEND US MONEY. Political parties now are nothing but fund raising machine to raise money for their elite who are also most likely members of the evil ones too.
We do not need political parties to have campaign. With no leader before the election there would be no reason to have costly leaders tour that is really an excuse to wine and dine members of the deadstream media. The deadstream media has become so lame that few bother to look at the ads in the media. If someone is interested in the policies etc. of a candidate, one usually resorts to the candidate’s web site - setting up and running a web site for an election is not a high expense or labour intensive. If a candidate can not attract a cabal of supporters to help with the other details of the campaign – do they have the qualities to be a leader.
Ban political parties and require the Prime Minister aspirant to build a majority team of supporters from those elected as the one that will best represent the electors will.
Our best and most effective action to restoring democracy and freedom in Canada may be to ban political parties (have come to think of them more in terms of a Terrorist organisation – all of them) should be consigned to history following their friends in the deadstream media. Will they get a discount if the political parties and deadstream have a joint funeral? Doubt there will be enough mourners to fill even a small hall.
Share this post