Coffee, Other News and More.
Thursday, September 14, 2023.
Today, I thought I'd revisit the cybercrime treaty that the UN has been in talks of the last two weeks of August ending September 1.
Fortunately, As you can see here that mentions that the convention ended without consensus on scope and deep divides surveillance powers.
Well, it's good news to see that the talks collapsed.
However, you think you can expect the evil ones to bring it back in and probably with a lot of the very invasive features that they want. We'll take a quick look at the Electronic Frontier Foundation's (EFF) web page on this.
They've been following it quite closely and actually do very good work.
I will be leaving the link for this page and I strongly encourage people to look at all the work the Electronic Frontier Foundation does.
They wrapped up this month, as I say, September 1st.
“One of the things was clear with time running out to finalize the text, little progress and consensus was reached on crucial points, such as the treaty's overall scope of application and the reach of criminal procedure mandates.”
Well, that's, that's good.
It collapsed because some countries wanted to protect the freedom of independence of their citizens.
There were a number of changes which probably contributed to the confusion not being passed.
You can look at these in the informal reports, which you can follow the link from the Electronic Frontier Foundation's webpage.
Now, they point out this particular treaty was the
Original Zero Draft was to be the last set of amendments, but things got rather complex when I guess you could say the countries that are least concerned about individual personal privacy, etc. were trying to expand the proposed Treaty of Surveillance scope to cover practically any offence imaginable where a computer was involved, both at home and abroad.
That's way to broad sweeping.
What the Burkina Faso’s delegate said, I guess probably you can say sums things up.
We believe a future convention ought to cover the largest possible range of offenses that would be committed using information and communication technologies.
Well, fortunately, some of the countries disagreed and well actually
The way things have been going, I'm becoming surprised that Canada stood up for individual rights and freedoms. But, Canada warned delegates about the potential consequences in a statement, which you can once again get on this page that I've left a link for, that garnered rare applause from the floor.
“It laid out in stark terms that the relentless push to expand the proposed treaty scope has turned into a general criminal mutual legal assistance treaty.
It leaves it completely over the hands of any state to decide what conduct is a crime or a serious crime.”
They go on, they talk about the reach and scope, its, encouraging to see Canada and I'm not sure that, well, it seems that New Zealand, Switzerland, Norway, Uruguay and Costa Rica were generally in line with it.
Surprisingly, even Microsoft, which I've come to feel is well in the pockets of the Deep State and the World Economic Forum, or I guess you could say controlled by the evil ones. I prefer that term. It just wraps them up in whatever title you want.
It'll be a while before you see this treaty come back in, but you can be sure it will come back in with much stronger terms and trying to take away the rights of the people.
Now whether it was protests from people like the Electronic Frontier Foundation, EFF, regular people contacting them such as myself and hopefully others did too, somewhere along the line they're beginning to wake up and realize that the individuals have rights.
I did do an article, the link is here I talking about what they were planning to do and let's say fortunately it collapsed.
Now well just take a look at this it almost stuns me coming from Canada but it's it's great.
“This is a UN Convention and as such our responsibility is much bigger than ourselves.
It is the people in those places where there is no protection and where this treaty will be an unprecedented multilateral tool to extend the reach and collaboration of repression and persecution.”
Well, I feel it is getting anywhere in the world fits that category.
We do have to keep an eye on what the UN is doing, they are trying these stunts to take away our human rights in so many areas, whether it be health, digital surveillance, who knows what.
How can an unelected body take over and have so much power.
But, then I guess when you realize that the UN really, if you dig back, could be considered a creature of the, well, at that time as the World Economic Forum was not in existence, I'm not sure which organization was calling the shots in the late 1940’s as the deep state then, but there seems to be a relentless drive on the part of the evil ones to take control of the world, the people in it, control your thoughts, control what you do, say and everything else.
I strongly encourage you to keep track of what's going on here.
Share this post